- DTN Headline News
Disparity in ARC Payments
Wednesday, October 7, 2015 9:54AM CDT

By Marcia Zarley Taylor
DTN Executive Editor

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (DTN) -- When USDA issues an estimated $3.5 billion in farm program checks for the 2014 crop to corn growers later this month, policymakers should brace for a torrent of complaints between the have nots and the haves.

Growers were warned that payments would vary based on county revenue formulas, but the disparity may catch some off guard. In parts of Texas, for example, growers in one county will collect about $109 per base corn acre, while those in a county next door will collect nothing. In Nebraska, some checks will run $20 an acre, others closer to $80 an acre. Similar situations are cropping up in Kansas, Iowa and Illinois, in large part because of the local variation in 2014 yields, policy experts report. In parts of Oklahoma, USDA may have had difficulty establishing county wheat yields, since farmers often graze fields rather than completing harvest, others theorize.

"In the past, Loan Deficiency Payments were the only farm program payment I can think of where checks varied by counties," said Dee Vaughan, a former National Corn Grower Association president and Dumas, Texas, grower. "But that amount varied by only a few dollars per acre, not by $100 an acre."

The shift to county-based calculations for the new farm safety net highlights how aid is supposed to be targeted to those in need. For most producers, it means bumper 2014 county yields offset the decline in prices, so they won't meet the threshold for farm payments. But for farmers who operate in more than one county, this bureaucratic technicality has become a sore point.

At issue is that program payments will be determined by your "administrative" county Farm Service Agency (FSA) office. For growers with farms in multiple counties, that rule means Agricultural Risk Coverage-County checks will not be paid at county rates where the ground is located but where records are housed.

All of Nebraska farmer John Oehlerking's 1,600-acre Nebraska farmland will be paid at the Otoe County rate even though half of his land is located in Cass County where other farmers are being paid at a much higher rate. The difference could be up to 50% more, although FSA has not released final calculations yet, he said.

"It is perplexing to me why my Cass County ground should be penalized, just because of where I sign my papers," Oehlerking told DTN. "Had I chosen to do all my paperwork in Cass County, I would have had a windfall."

Payments in Cass County are projected to be close to $50 an acre for corn while projected payments in Otoe County are projected at $18 an acre.

Underpaying some land and overpaying others makes little sense. But when Oehlerking contacted his FSA office "they were polite but they basically said, 'We don't like it either, but there is nothing we can do about it, so contact your elected officials,'" he said.

Iowa corn growers first noticed the discrepancy last winter, but the last-minute remedy they were able to secure in the FSA handbook only allowed farmers to change administrative offices due to a county FSA office closure or consolidation. Even then, farmers were required to designate a new office by Sept. 25 for 2014 payment purposes.

"FSA communicated this change in April. However, I am not aware of any direct outreach to individual farmers as they did on other farm program changes," said National Corn Growers Association's Sam Willett, who calls the experience one of the more frustrating issues encountered with implementation of the farm bill. FSA argued that paying farmers based on where the land was located, rather than where records were housed, would create an administrative nightmare.

"My understanding is that the complexity of their information and record systems made it very difficult for FSA to alter their procedures," Willett added.

Congress gave FSA enough flexibility to pay farmers based on the counties where their land is located, a House Agriculture Committee staffer told a group of agricultural economists this week in Louisville. Hopefully, there's a pathway there, he said. As a last resort, a farmer hurt by an FSA action has the right to ask for "equitable" relief.

Brad Lubben, a University of Nebraska economist who specializes in farm policy, said a formula for blending irrigated and non-irrigated acres may also contribute to some payment disparities. FSA determined that counties needed at least 25% irrigated production and 25% non-irrigated production to break irrigated and non-irrigated fields into separate county yields by farm practice.

Nebraska counties with high percentages of irrigated corn acres were much more likely to trigger 2014 ARC payments than dryland corn acres, Lubben said. That's because the non-irrigated farmers in 2014 had higher overall yields than their average yield used in the ARC formula. In situations where the 25% irrigation rule wasn't met, FSA blended irrigated yields and non-irrigated yields into a single county average, which may also skew results.

For growers with multiple county locations and underpaid due to the administrative ruling, Lubben said "an administrative appeal may be in order."

Marcia Taylor can be reached at marcia.taylor@dtn.com

Follow her on Twitter @MarciaZTaylor


blog iconDTN Blogs & Forums
DTN Market Matters Blog
Katie Micik
Markets Editor
Monday, October 5, 2015 4:59PM CDT
Thursday, October 1, 2015 6:26PM CDT
Monday, September 28, 2015 3:07PM CDT
Technically Speaking
Darin Newsom
DTN Senior Analyst
Sunday, October 4, 2015 10:33PM CDT
Sunday, October 4, 2015 10:11PM CDT
Sunday, October 4, 2015 9:50PM CDT
Fundamentally Speaking
Joel Karlin
DTN Contributing Analyst
Thursday, October 1, 2015 2:50PM CDT
Tuesday, September 29, 2015 5:47PM CDT
Wednesday, September 23, 2015 3:37PM CDT
DTN Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton
DTN Ag Policy Editor
Wednesday, October 7, 2015 3:25PM CDT
Monday, October 5, 2015 10:41PM CDT
Monday, October 5, 2015 1:43AM CDT
Minding Ag's Business
Marcia Taylor
DTN Executive Editor
Wednesday, September 30, 2015 8:29PM CDT
Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:04PM CDT
Monday, September 21, 2015 7:26PM CDT
DTN Ag Weather Forum
Bryce Anderson
DTN Ag Meteorologist and DTN Analyst
Tuesday, October 6, 2015 7:09PM CDT
Friday, October 2, 2015 8:48PM CDT
Thursday, October 1, 2015 3:47PM CDT
DTN Production Blog
Pam Smith
Crops Technology Editor
Monday, October 5, 2015 7:10PM CDT
Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:08PM CDT
Thursday, September 17, 2015 5:16PM CDT
Harrington's Sort & Cull
John Harrington
DTN Livestock Analyst
Wednesday, September 30, 2015 6:19PM CDT
Friday, September 18, 2015 8:11PM CDT
Friday, September 4, 2015 6:22PM CDT
South America Calling
Alastair Stewart
South America Correspondent
Monday, October 5, 2015 5:33PM CDT
Monday, October 5, 2015 2:49PM CDT
Friday, October 2, 2015 10:21PM CDT
An Urban’s Rural View
Urban Lehner
Editor Emeritus
Thursday, October 1, 2015 9:30PM CDT
Monday, September 28, 2015 11:00AM CDT
Thursday, September 17, 2015 6:54PM CDT
Machinery Chatter
Jim Patrico
Progressive Farmer Senior Editor
Monday, September 28, 2015 6:35PM CDT
Wednesday, September 23, 2015 11:23AM CDT
Wednesday, September 16, 2015 11:32AM CDT
Canadian Markets
Cliff Jamieson
Canadian Grains Analyst
Tuesday, October 6, 2015 6:59PM CDT
Friday, October 2, 2015 6:59PM CDT
Thursday, October 1, 2015 9:12PM CDT
Editor’s Notebook
Greg D. Horstmeier
DTN Editor-in-Chief
Wednesday, October 7, 2015 3:37PM CDT
Wednesday, September 23, 2015 5:46PM CDT
Wednesday, September 9, 2015 7:33PM CDT
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN